PSIS 2008-A Clinical
Storyboards
Amendment History:
|
|
|
1.0
|
28-Sep-2007
|
Revised presentation of Clinical Scenario Document
(NPFIT-FNT-TO-DPM-0606)
|
Forecast Changes:
Reviewers:
This document inherits its approved status from NPFIT-FNT-TO-DPM-0606.
Approvals:
This document inherits its
approved status from NPFIT-FNT-TO-DPM-0606.
Distribution:
|
|
Local
Service Providers
|
|
National
Application Service Provider
|
|
Existing Service
Providers
|
|
Document Status:
This is a controlled document. This document version is only valid at
the time it is retrieved from controlled file store, after which a new approved
version will replace it.
On receipt of a new issue, please destroy all previous issues (unless a
specified earlier issue is base lined for use throughout the programme).
Related Documents:
These
documents will provide additional information:
Ref no
|
Doc Reference Number
|
Title
|
Version
|
1
|
NPFIT-FNT-TO-DPM-0597
|
PSIS 2008-A Process and Data Models
|
|
Glossary
of Terms:
|
|
ESP
|
Existing Service Provider
|
LSP
|
Local Service Provider
|
NASP
|
National Application Service Provider
|
NPfIT
|
National Programme for Information Technology
|
PCT
|
Primary Care
Trust
|
PDS
|
Personal Demographics Service
|
PSIS
|
Personal Spine Information Services
|
SCR
|
Summary Care
Record
|
TMS
|
Transaction & Messaging Service
|
CDA
|
Clinical Document Architecture
|
EPS
|
Electronic Prescribing Service
|
RBAC
|
Role Based Access Control
|
LR
|
Legitimate Relationships
|
Table of Contents
TOC \o "1-2" \h \z \u 1...... Introduction. PAGEREF _Toc178739928 \h
5
2...... Storyboards –
Emergency Department
PAGEREF _Toc178739929 \h
6
2.1. Jake (Child with laceration of the
tongue)
PAGEREF _Toc178739930 \h
6
2.3 Mavis (Adult with Subarachnoid
Haemorrhage) Part I
PAGEREF _Toc178739931 \h
8
3...... Storyboards -
Discharge.
PAGEREF _Toc178739932 \h
9
3.1. Mavis Part II
PAGEREF _Toc178739933 \h
9
3.2. Colonel Mustard (Adult with Myocardial
Infarction)
PAGEREF _Toc178739934 \h
10
3.3. Harriet (Child with Cerebral Palsy
admitted as a day care patient for examination)
PAGEREF _Toc178739935 \h
11
3.4. Mary - Maternity Discharge Summary
Example.
PAGEREF _Toc178739936 \h
12
3.5. John (Paediatric Intensive Care – Long
Discharge Report)
PAGEREF _Toc178739937 \h
13
4...... Scenarios -
Outpatient
PAGEREF _Toc178739938 \h
14
4.1. Wilfred (Adult with Lipoma) PAGEREF _Toc178739939 \h
14
4.2. Ethel (Adult attending Cardiology
Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic)
PAGEREF _Toc178739940 \h
15
The delivery of the NHS Care Records Service
(NHS CRS) is
a central part of the National Programme for IT (NPfIT)
and is being delivered by NHS Connecting for
Health, an agency of the Department of Health. The NHS
CRS’s primary role is to deliver integrated IT
systems and services to help modernise the NHS
and provide systems that will support patient centred care.
The recent National Audit Office report on the NPfIT
confirmed that the NHS CRS
is much needed and can bring great benefits to both the NHS
and patients through improved efficiency (fewer wasted consultations or repeat
investigations) and better communication between healthcare professionals and
organisations (missing records).
The NHS
CRS will provide a patient record service 24
hours a day seven days a week; accessible by health professionals whether they
work in hospital, primary care or community
services. When implemented, the NHS CRS will function across care
settings and organisations and will support planned, emergency and unscheduled care.
The NHS
Summary Care Record (NHS
SCR) is the national element of the NHS CRS which will create a summarized electronic care record for every registered NHS
patient in England
by 2010. It will be held on a national database known as the Personal Spine
Information Service (PSIS), ensuring that
demographic and clinical information such as major diagnoses, allergies,
adverse reactions to drugs, other significant information, medications and
details of treatment in secondary care are
always accessible.
This document contains
a number of clinical storyboards which provide clinical contexts for the
example messages and information examples.
Jake, a boy of 6, is on
holiday when he falls and lacerates his tongue. His father takes him to the
nearest Emergency Department. They arrive and the receptionist logs this with
the Local Service Provider (LSP) system, which
queries the Personal Demographics Service (PDS)
and verifies Jake’s demographic details. The nature and time of the injury is
recorded on the Local Service Provider (LSP) system
and legitimate relationships (LR) are created
for the ED team.
The
Triage Nurse using a smart card and PIN accesses the LSP
- ED system and finds the entry for Jake. Selecting the entry for Jake opens a
screen which allows clinical details to be entered into the LSP
system and also displays Jake’s Summary Care
Record held on PSIS, which shows a history of
asthma, his current medication, a possible allergy to penicillin and his tetanus
immunisation status.
Upon
examining Jake’s tongue, the nurse finds that the bleeding has now stopped and
the injury does not require any further treatment; she issues a patient advice
leaflet from the Local Service Provider (LSP)
system and recommends that Jake’s father gets some paracetamol syrup. Jake is
discharged from the department.
An
Emergency Department Report is prepared which includes details of the care episode relevant times, advice given and medication recommendations.
The report is validated and sent by the Triage Nurse to the PSIS
and to Jake’s GP.
Notes:
The
Triage Nurse is an independent practitioner and therefore has Role Based Access
Control (RBAC) permissions and an LR with the
patient, so she can send messages to PSIS.
2.2 Sally (Adult visiting Emergency Department)
Sally,
a 20 year old student, is brought to the Emergency Department with heavy PV blood loss. Reception
staff accesses PDS via the Local Service
Provider (LSP) system, which confirm her
details and legitimate relationships (LR) are
created for the ED team. This shows that she is registered with a GP in Harlow.
Sally
is seen by the emergency department physician who accesses the LSP ED system using a smart card and PIN and selects the
entry for Sally on the LSP – ED system, which
opens a screen allowing clinical details to be entered and also displays
Sally’s Summary Care Record held on PSIS. She confirms that the information retrieved from PSIS is correct. It showed that she has been taking the
OCP and was prescribed a course of penicillin two months ago to treat
tonsillitis. It is also noted that Sally’s LMP was 8 weeks previously.
When
questioned she said that she had been sexually active during the last few
months. On examination, Sally has supra pubic pain and low back pain in
addition to the bleeding PV. Sally’s vital
signs are recorded; none were compromised.
A
urine pregnancy test was found to be positive and a differential diagnosis of ectopic
pregnancy or miscarriage is made. Sally is admitted to the 24 hour observation
ward and is given analgesia. She has some blood taken for testing, including a
full blood count, blood group in case Rhesus negative
and a Kleihauer test.
The
next day, an U/S scan confirms a blighted
ovum. Sally is keen to return to her student home. She is discharged by the
Gynaecology Registrar, who gave her an advice leaflet and he instructed her to
seek advice if the bleeding did not stop. An Emergency Department Report of
Sally’s care is written and saved on the Local
Service Provider (LSP) system
Sally
is prescribed co-codamol, which is collected from the pharmacy by the nurse.
Later
that day, Sally’s Kleihauer test result is returned as positive, she is
confirmed as Rh-Ve.
These results are reviewed by the gynaecologist, who completes the Emergency
Department Report including a request for the GP
to undertake anti D immunisation as per local policy. He verifies the report and
sends it to PSIS and to the GP’s
system. The Gynaecology Registrar phones the GP’s
surgery to advise the GP to read and act upon
the report he has sent.
Mavis
who is known to have migraine, develops a severe headache and is worried by the
associated photophobia and vomiting. She decides to attend the local Emergency
Department. When she arrives she gives her details to the receptionist who logs
into the Local Service Provider (LSP) system
which checks her details on the Personal Demographic Service (PDS).
The nature and time of the headache is recorded on the Local Service Provider (LSP) system and legitimate relationships (LR) are created for the ED team.
Dr
Carter (ED) sees Mavis having already reviewed her Summary Care
Record and decides that a CT scan is required,
because she has developed neck stiffness in addition to her previous symptoms.
The CT is performed and Dr Carter is able to
view the scan via PACS. He sees a small Subarachnoid
Haemorrhage and decides to refer her to the Neurosurgical department. Mr Head (consultant neurosurgeon) is based at the local
teaching hospital, he records Mavis’ NHS
number whilst speaking to Dr Carter and views the CT
scan on PACS. Mr
Head’s opinion is that the haemorrhage is more clinically significant than Dr
Carter had initially anticipated.
Mr Head recommends that Mavis should be admitted to the
Neurosurgical Unit. Later that day Mavis is transferred to the Neurosurgical
Unit, Dr Carter composes an Emergency Department Report which is sent to PSIS and to the GP.
Following
deterioration in Mavis’s clinical state, a further CT
scan leads to a decision to operate on a Berry Aneurysm in the Circle of Willis.
She suffers a left sided stroke with right sided weakness; post-operatively she
is transferred to the hospital’s rehabilitation unit from where she is
discharged home.
Mr Head’s Specialist Registrar writes her Discharge
Report which includes details of her admission, her treatments, her discharge
medications (taken from EPS) and a plan for
further rehabilitation and ongoing care with community
support from the charity Headway. The Discharge Report is verified and a copy
is sent to PSIS, her GP,
the physiotherapist, the occupational therapist and the speech therapist
involved in her care and Social Services (to
arrange a social worker visit). An additional letter including abbreviated
details of her care is sent to PSIS and the charity Headway.
Notes:
This
scenario demonstrates the case in which
documents are sent following Mavis’s discharge from both ED and Neurosurgery.
However, clinicians might choose to send a single Discharge Report following
Mavis’s discharge from the Neurosurgical Department that covers Mavis’s treatment
within ED and Neurosurgical Department.
Colonel
Mustard, an 85 year old man, is at home in the Library when he experiences
crushing central chest pain and looses consciousness. On hearing him fall his
housekeeper Miss Scarlet rushes into the room and dials 999. Ambulance control take
details of the event and send a paramedic ambulance to the house. Ambulance Control
Staff retrieve the Colonel’s NHS Summary Care record from PSIS
via the Clinical Spine Application (CSA (web
based viewer)). It shows that he consulted his GP
two days previously when he was noted to have high blood pressure and had been
asked to return to have his blood pressure checked in a few days time.
When
the Ambulance arrives, Colonel Mustard has recovered consciousness and is able
to tell them that he had chest pain. They transfer him to the ambulance, and
perform an ECG which confirms a Myocardial
Infarction.
On
arrival at the hospital, he is admitted directly to CCU.
The registrar on duty obtains the Colonel’s summary Care
Record from PSIS specifically looking at the
medication summary, allergy and adverse reactions and diagnoses. It is
confirmed that he is suitable for Thrombolysis and Streptokinase is given, along
with diamorphine for pain.
Colonel
Mustard gradually recovers and is discharged from CCU
to the General Medical Ward.
Four
days after his admission he is considered fit for discharge home. Whilst in
hospital the clinical staff realised that Miss Scarlet is also quite elderly
and it is discovered that she is 84 and not as healthy as she once was;
therefore a social service assessment was conducted for Colonel Mustard. The
ward doctor prescribes his take home medication via the LSP
system which is sent directly to the hospital pharmacy. After dispensing, a
message is sent from pharmacy updating his medication record on the LSP system indicating that the one month’s supply had
been dispensed.
The
ward doctor then prepares a Discharge Report containing the information in the table
below. The discharge summary is sent to PSIS,
Colonel Mustard’s GP and local Social Services.
Note: As the initial
investigation and diagnosis is made by the paramedic in the ambulance the
clinically relevant time will be prior to the admission time.
Harriet
is a 3 year old child with cerebral palsy, who is admitted as a day care patient for Examination under Anaesthesia and
injection of Botulinum Toxin to her hamstrings and adductors. She is
accompanied by her Mother.
The
Theatre Nurse using a smart card and PIN accesses the Harriet’s Detailed Care Record on the LSP
system and finds her name on the theatre list. Selecting her entry opens a
screen which allows clinical details to be entered into the LSP
system and also displays her Summary Care
Record held on PSIS, The details of the
admission are recorded by the nurse.
The
surgeon examines Harriet’s lower limbs on the ward and makes careful note of
the range of movement. This data is recorded by the orthopaedic house officer
in the pre operative assessment field of the
detailed record.
Following
Harriet’s procedure, a description of the procedure, findings and plan for
follow up care are added in text form to the
detailed record. Harriet is discharged later in the day and the date and time
of discharge is recorded.
After
the surgical procedure the Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon records the operative
details using a Dictaphone in theatre. This includes details of the treatment
given, and a brief summary of the anaesthetic. The tape is given to his
secretary at the end of the day. She types the operative details into the detailed
care record three days later, and then
produces a discharge summary using the PDS
admin details, relevant details from the pre-operative
assessment page and the operative details.
SNOMED
encoded Data in fields, such as “Diagnosis” from the Detailed Care
Record is used to populate Harriet’s Discharge Report which is then seen and
verified by the Orthopaedic Specialist Registrar and then sent electronically
to the PSIS and to the GP.
Note:
It is assumed that the
parents and GP are aware of the follow on
activities, such as physiotherapy and so this would not be recorded in
discharge note.
Mary
is a 27 year old female of Black Caribbean ethnicity. She becomes pregnant and
her antenatal provider is her GP. Her
pregnancy is complicated by hypertension and, since she is pregnant with twins,
she is referred to the local hospital for shared care
with the maternity unit. At 38 weeks gestation she attends St
Elsewhere’s maternity unit for an elective caesarean section.
On
20/9/06 she is admitted to the unit, her details checked and the relevant
investigations undertaken. On 22/9/06 she undergoes an elective caesarean
section under spinal anaesthesia and is delivered of two healthy babies, Alex, and
twin 2 who remained un-named. The procedure is
relatively uncomplicated although Mary does suffer a moderate loss
of blood. Mary’s subsequent recovery is uncomplicated and the twins are well,
with no problems noted at their neonatal checks.
The
receptionist at the Maternity unit logs into PDS
enters appropriate demographic information for the babies and generates 2 new NHS numbers.
Mary
and the babies are discharged on 27/9/06, back to the care
of the community services. At this point one of the babies has still not been
named but each has been allocated an NHS
number. Mary is given a post-natal out-patient appointment for 10th November at St
Elsewhere’s maternity unit.
Mary
is given some advice on contraception use.
Three
Discharge Reports are sent, one relating to Mary and one for each of the twins.
The
letters are sent to PSIS, the GP and copied to the Health Visitor and the Practice
Nurse.
3.5.
John
(Paediatric Intensive Care – Long Discharge
Report)
John,
a previously well 9 year old boy, was admitted to the Emergency Department of
Macclesfield Royal Infirmary (A District General Hospital), on 10th March 2007,
with a short history of fever, headache and lethargy. Shortly after reaching
hospital he suffered a severe deterioration, including cardiovascular collapse
and loss of consciousness. A diagnosis of septicaemia and meningitis was made
and he was transferred to St Eleswhere’s Paediatric Intensive Care Unit on the
same day.
Initially
he was extremely unstable, requiring inotropic support, sedation, ventilation,
and antibiotics. Pneumococcal sepsis was confirmed on blood culture and PCR. Following
an initial CT scan and confirmatory MRI scan showing cerebellar tonsillar
herniation, he underwent a foramen magnum decompression under the care of the
neurosurgical team.
After
a prolonged admission to PICU, John was eventually discharged to Macclesfield
Royal Infirmary 6 months later on September 11th 2007.
At
discharge he had a flaccid quadriplegia and remained ventilator dependent. He
was fed using a gastrostomy and required intermittent catheterisation. He had
problems with chronic pain and was being managed by both St
Elsewhere’s chronic pain team and the Spinal Injuries Unit at Stoke Mandeville.
He
required the fitting of a lumbar brace by the Spinal Surgeons at St Elsewhere’s
and was confined to a wheelchair.
During
his admission John was noted to have a severe reaction to the antibiotic
Teicoplanin.
At
discharge from PICU a Discharge Report was composed
by the Paediatric Intensive Care Fellow. The
local system automatically populated the document with the medications
dispensed from the pharmacy. The document was then verified by the PIC
Consultant and sent to PSIS, as well as the
following recipients:
Dr A Davies (John’s GP)
Dr
D Duncan, Consultant Paediatrician, Macclesfield Royal Infirmary
Dr
F Moody, Consultant in Spinal Injury, National Spinal Injuries Centre
Dr
I Lewis, Consultant Paediatric Neurologist, St. Elsewhere’s Hospital
Dr
Dooley, Consultant Paediatric Endocrinologist, St. Elsewhere’s Hospital
Dr
F Hurt, Consultant Anesthestist / Pain Management, St.
Elsewhere’s Hospital
Mr L
Head, Consultant Neurosurgeon, St.
Elsewhere’s Hospital
Mr B Boswell, Consultant Spinal Surgeon, St. Elsewhere’s Hospital
Wilfred consults his GP
about a lump he has noticed on his thigh, the GP
records this in the detailed record as significant data. This sends a GP update to PSIS The GP books
an appointment using Choose and Book and sends a referral letter/message. When
Wilfred arrives at the outpatient clinic, the receptionist checks his details
on the Local Service Provider (LSP) system which
confirms Wilfred’s demographic details with PDS
and the appointment with Choose and Book.
The Surgeon reviews Wilfred’s referral
letter and Summary Care Record, he takes a medical history and examines the
patient. He agrees that it is probably a Lipoma and that it needs to be removed
under general anaesthetic. The surgeon records his findings on the detailed
care record using the Local Service Provider (LSP) system in the hospital and
books him onto the operating list in 2 months time.
At the end of the clinic the surgeon reviews
the patients he has seen and prepares an Outpatient Report which is sent to PSIS
and Wilfred’s GP.
Ethel has had Chest Pain for a number of
weeks and has referred herself to the Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic. On
arrival at the clinic the receptionist registers her attendance with the LSP
system which checks her demographic details on PDS and books her into the
clinic that morning.
The clinic nurse using a smart card
and PIN accesses the LSP system and finds the entry for Ethel. Selecting the
entry for Ethel opens a screen which allows clinical details to be entered into
the LSP system and also displays Ethel’s Summary Care Record held on PSIS. The
nurse checks her current medication,
takes a history which confirms that Ethel conforms to the clinic’s referral
criteria and takes blood from Ethel. The specialist registrar examines Ethel
and decides she is fit enough to have an exercise ECG and a chest X-ray; he
records his finding on the detailed care record of the LSP system.
Ethel has her Chest X-ray, with the image
stored on PACS. On her return to the clinic, Ethel has a resting ECG recorded. As
the trace is essentially normal, Ethel has an exercise ECG.
The senior physician reviews Ethel’s
clinical history including the summary care record, which has been seamlessly
integrated into the screen displaying the detailed care record from the Local
Service Provider (LSP) system, blood results, ECG and Chest X-Ray. He confirms
the diagnosis of angina and records this within the Hospital’s detailed care
record system. He then arranges for her to have fasting glucose and lipid tests
and to come in for coronary angiography in 2 weeks.
He prescribes aspirin, and atenolol. At the
end of the clinic an Outpatient Report of Ethel’s attendance is prepared using information stored in the
detailed care record held on the Local Service
Provider (LSP) system.